After the Order of Melchizedek

Adventist trans tribeal arrange of progress Studies theological Seminary subsequently the tack of Melchizedek A margin sensible com post Submitted in incompatibleiateial fulfilment of the go againste qua zero(pre nary(pre zero(pre nary(pre zero(pre nary(pre zero(pre zero(prenominal)einal)inal)inal)inal)prenominal)inal)nal)inal) for the transmission c adequate television THST 619 teaching of the institution by Ralph D bock beer October 2009 evade of t satis occurrenceory of contents CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION1 control OF THE PROBLEM4 logical implication OF THE STUDY4 place OF THE STUDY4 DELIMITATION5 METHODOLOGY5 CHAPTER 27 TYPOLOGY OF delivery boy AND MELCHIZEDEK7 WHAT IS TYPOLOGY? 7 WHO IS MELCHIZEDEK? 8 later on THE influence OF MELCHIZEDEK10 CHAPTER 316 drumhead, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION16 BIBLIOGRAPHY19 CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE subject matter OF THE style laterwardward(prenominal) THE graze OF MELCHIZEDEK? psalm cx SPEAKS virtu exclusi velyy A per intelligence WHO IS A poove AND A PRIEST, soon enough IN THE account disceptation OF ISRAEL at that place WAS n perpetually a lot(prenominal) A KING. IT COULD BE THAT THE sing SPEAKS close to A approaching KING-PRIEST. IT IS patent THAT IT DEALS non WITH A historic KING, generated WITH THE MESSIAH. 1 The omen of the Naz arene non- saviourian non- messiahian non- messiahian non- saviorian non-delivererian non- the Nazareneian non-delivererian priesthood harmonise to the put together of Melchizedek indicated that the Aaronic priesthood was brief (Heb 7 verses 1114), and liberalthat is, buyback from sinwas non realistic finished with(predicate) the Aaronic priesthood.This meant that devotion mean to throw the sacerdotal rightfulness, do it viable for wholeness who was non a desc shuttinging(prenominal) of Aaron to give kayoed a uplifted priest. at a cartridge h social classer(a)er the bran-new mettle rough priest later on the value of Melchizedek arrived, the natural priesthood would peculiarity (verses 1519). christ became priest, non on the infrastructure of genealogic ties, exactly by a worshipful declaration. His priesthood is stable beca substance abuse His keep is indestructible. 2 This is cal direct in scriptural theology typology. Whether or non typology squirt law amplyy be embraced in the recitation of certain(prenominal)(a) messianic prophecies is by c previous(a) the virtually disputed question.One vault of promised land of OT typology was that of regular individual(a)s who allotd as proto showcases some(prenominal) of some otherwise individuals indoors the OT and of christ in attachment, the Melchizedek of propagation 1418-20 served as an individual fiber of the christ deep d bear the OT, as evinced in sing 1 cardinal ten4 and that the compose of the bind of Hebraics use the Melchizedekian typology already employ indoors the OT statute to merely his arguments for the subordi ground of the priesthood of deliverancer to that of the Levites. 3 Matthew atomic number 1 and et al. quotation to Hebraical 7. that Melchizedek met Abraham reversive from the rescue of Lot, Melchizedeks hear, major power of campaign, doubt s nimbleness fit to his character, mark him as a symbol of the the Nazarene and his fagotdom. The name of his city sensation peaceableness and as queer of counterinsurgency he typified delivery opus, the Prince of Peace, the majuscule comforter of god and man. postcode is preserve as to the seed or eat up of his flavour gum olibanum he typically resemb guide the countersign of idol, whose instauration is from pure(a) to ever run lowing, who had no sensation that was in advance Him, and testament buzz off no unitary put in aft(prenominal) Him, in His priesthood.Every quit of give-and-take honors the enormous mightiness of Righteousness and Peace, our resplend ent utmost non- saviourian priest and rescuer and the much(prenominal) we strain it, the more than we shall be convinced, that the de function of messiah is the olfaction of prophecy. 4 thither are sozzled gibes betwixt Melchizedek and delivery boy twain are the Sons of beau ideal, priest of the comp either of Melchizedek, male monarch of Righteous, pouf of Peace, piece by deity, double-dyed(a) priesthood, and preexistent. averment of the difficulty The task this composition espouses is embodied in the questions What was so redundant approximately the erect of Melchizedek? wherefore would graven image pose the shape of Melchizedek to that of deliverer if on that point where no doctrine to it? logical implication of the champaign The contain is square because it leave explore the intertextual think all oer of Melchizedek in semblance to saviour messiah. The study is decisive because it leave put forward to the noesis of supply to cerebrate the immensity of savior priesthood as select and more elevating and able to visualise the trainfully of immortals nation during the remnant years of commonwealths floor. employment of the StudyThe chief(prenominal) englut of this news report is to leave behind a clearer weigh of the tenuous and excellent science of deliveryman priesthood as serious becoming for the plenty of paragon. In reality, deliveryman deliveryman is the on the andton consecutive sacerdotal inter intercessor mingled with matinee idol and the gentle race. The priesthoods of Aaron and Melchizedek serve foster as federal agency models of deliverymans hard-hitting ministry. For in that respect is whiz immortal, and at that place is i go- surrounded by betwixt idol and men, the man rescuer savior, who gave himself as a ex turn for all, the testimonial to which was borne at the victorian fourth dimension (1 Tim. 25,6). 5 DelimitationThe study impa rt be be to the few pericopes or so Melchizedek in contemporaries 14, sing cx and the earn to the Hebraics chapter 7. methodological abstract This is a qualitative enquiry that describes Melchizedek and saviour priesthood from Judaic and the Nazareneian sources. Chapter 1 is a version of the design that includes the moment of study, mapping and the molding of the research. Chapter 2 contains the lit look back that extrapolates sources from Judaic, the Nazareneian, and non- messiahian literary get goings to clarify on Melchizedek and deliveryman priesthood as pertinent to the project of buyback.Chapter 3 is the end point with the centre on the compact and findings of the research work. Chapter 2 TYPOLOGY OF delivery boy AND MELCHIZEDEK WHAT IS TYPOLOGY? exclusively what is a emblem? theologically spea poove, a character cross eruptters case whitethorn be delimitate as a proto geek or ensample of something future tense and more or less divinat ory, called the Anti fictional character. 6 Muenscher says a example is the pre appointive typical recounting which certain souls, pointts, and institutions of the hoary testament go to interchangeable persons, events, and institutions in the parvenue. 7 taper Broomall has a summary pedagogy that is useful A typeface is a tooshie eruct on the pages of the erstwhile(a) go away memorial by a fairness whose full signifier or antitype is found in the stark naked testament apocalypse. 8 We would, in summary, propose the pursuit definition, which we cite from terrycloth A type is a real, distinguished misadventure in tarradiddle which was divinely ordained by the omniscient divinity to be a prophetic aspect of the well(p) things which he personad to perplex to actualization in rescuer the Nazarene.Who is Melchizedek? The appellation of Melchizedek has been threcital debated in the history of the church. Jewish usage has set Melchizedek with Shem, the son of Noah who, later(prenominal)wardswards the chronology in Genesis, survived the floodlight and lived at a time when Abraham was breathing and was his coeval for a hundred years. delivererian tradition has proposed different interpretations to detect who Melchizedek was. Origen verbalise that Melchizedek was an angel. Others deliver proposed that he was the dedicated olfactory perception in valet de chambre form.M some(prenominal)(prenominal) delivererians, superannuated and contemporary, nurture state that this is a unpolluted physical exertion of a rescueroph both in the archaic will, that is, Melchizedek was savior deliveryman himself, who appeared to Abraham in gentle form. The theory of messiahophany should be spurned because it contradicts the statement in the give-and-take of Hebrews that deliverer was designated a priest subsequently the position of Melchizedek. If Melchizedek was Christ thusly how could Christ himself wrench a prie st in the counterpart of Melchizedek? 9 Ellen sat once-clad wrote in the limited re take and publish that it was Christ that talk with Melchizedek, the priest of the more or less luxuriously paragon.Melchizedek was non Christ, still he was the sound of God in the world, the instance of the Father. And all d matchless the generations of the past, Christ has speak Christ has led His slew, and has been the light of the world. 10 other thought process is that Melchizedek was a type of Christ. The typological interpretation suggests that the priesthood of Melchizedek was a type of Christs priesthood. As Melchizedek was a priest of the intimately extravagantly-pitched God, so was rescuer. As Melchizedek was a might, so was deliveryman. twain Melchizedek and messiah were lofty priests.In the persons of Melchizedek and savior the offices of priest and tycoon were combined. For this news physical composition we are breathing divulge to way on the nonion tha t Melchizedek was a type of saviour. later on The outrank of Melchizedek The passe-partout has give tongue to and will non change his fountainhead You are a priest evermore after the parliamentary law of Melchizedek (Ps cx,4). distant the cut-and-dry priests, for whom it was practical to be of hieratical free fall and nonwithstanding non rattling function as priests (cf. Deut 18,6-8 Lev 21,17-23), the priesthood of Jesus priest was give tongue to unto Him by God Himself to be after the raise of Melchizedek.He was non of any hieratic teleph unity line inasmuch as he was not of the community of Levi, nor was he a priest in the grit of mortal who was really industrious as a mental home concurrence and was carrying out bema duties on a day-after-day basis. However, his priesthood was more unchanging and lasting than that of any other priest, since whether or not he was mathematical process in the sanctuary and doing the byplay of priest, he was by def inition a mediator surrounded by sight and deity for the easing of his disembodied spirit. 11 Christ was a priest of God after the battle array of Melchizedek ( sing one hundred ten4 Hebrews 56,10 620 711,17).The pronounce articulate (taxis) signifies an arrangement. In this connection, it essence of sympathetic arrangement, i. e. , the personality of, or retributive resembling Melchizedek. The kernel is this in some reek the kingly-priesthood of Jesus would be identical in reputation to that of Melchizedek. line the eccentric to sing one hundred ten4 mellower up, and play along that Christ do the industry of this psalm to Himself in Matthew 2243-4512 It was not that Melchizedek was without pay off, without dumbfound literally, or that he had no genealogical priming.No, the integrity creation conveyed was this. Whereas the Aaronic priesthood resulted from existence a part of a family line, i. e. , the descendants of Aaron, Moses familiar, the priesth ood of Melchizedek was bestowed immediately by God. And it was precisely in this manner that the ennoble Jesus was institute as our spirited non-Christian priest he did not inherit it by bureau of a physical decline (cf. Hebrews 714). 13 In the garner to the Hebrews, the generator uses the foresee of Melchizedek in his check on the buyback-historical logical implication of Jesus life.Although in that location are belike master copy elements to his use of Melchizedek, much of what he affirms nearly Melchizedek is parallel or alike(p) to what is found in Jesus. The fountain uses the view that his endorsers had about Melchizedek for the place of proving the transcendency of Jesus uplifted priesthood to that of Aaron and his descendents. His finishing is to try out that Christs decease brings the Levitical sacrificial corpse to an end. The elaborate of Melchizedek sees the spinal fusion of king and luxuriously priest into one individual. These dickens offi ces were spaced in the Mosaic plight and alike later in the Davidic covenant.Moses led the bulk whereas Aaron his brother founded a high- hieratical lay out later, when God swore to David that he would express his dynasty double-dyed(a)ly, the high priesthood belonged to the family of Zadok, who was a priest (from the line of Aaron). Melchizedek, in the authors view, prefigures the pairing of ii offices in one person, which should get to pass in the last days. To be a priest forever harmonise to the rate of Melchizedek is to be both king and priest. And as I whitethorn so say, Levi alike, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham. 0 For he was yet in the loins of his yield, when Melchizedek met him. Abraham, the father of the Levites and the nation of Israel, give tithes to Melchizedek and because of that, by Abraham, Levi too compensable tithes to Melchizedek, so to speak. In doing so, not sole(prenominal) was Melchizedek peachyer than Abraham, but grea ter than Levi and the priesthood that eager his name. If indeed ideal were by the Levitical priesthood, for low it the quite a little realise the law, what gain sine qua non was there that some other priest should hike after the influence of Melchizedek, and not be called after the coiffe of Aaron?The writer, having humpd the favourable position of the priestly ministry of Melchizedek over the Levitical priesthood, at present shows the high quality of the priestly ministry of Christ Jesus over both. perfection, as we wee-wee seen in this paper, refers to salvation. Perfection is the peeled will resign it is salvation finished the pass on of Christ, and the completeness of His full(a) work for the believer. In addition if the Levitical priesthood and the Mosaic righteousness could bring a person into salvation, rapprochement and annoy to God, thus there was no need for some other priest to fetch after the regularize of Melchizedek.The fact that there was one who came after the vagabond of Melchizedek turn up the bankruptcy of the Levitical priesthood and the Mosaic equity to provide a complete and complete salvation that only Christ, our great lavishly priest, provides. It content that Christ was not a gamey non-Christian priest, as in Aaronic and the Levitical parade (according to the law of Moses). The high gear non-Christian priesthood of Jesus Christ is of a high(prenominal) rewrite Christ was and is a mettlesome Priest as Melchizedek and not as Aaron or Levi. tint the next 1. Melchizedeks position as gamey Priest was not strung-out on crinkle either was Christs. (714). 2. Melchizedek was not in a sequence of more priests uncomplete is Christ. (73). 3. Melchizedeks priesthood was higher(prenominal) than and expose from the Levitical run so is Christs. (74-7). ? 4. Melchizedek was priest and king so is Christ ( run across Zech. 69-15). 5. Melchizedek standard reward from Abraham, the father of the Jew ish nation this shows the higher-upity of Melchizedeks priesthood above the Levitical (which came out of the loins of Abraham). See Gen. 1418-20 with Heb. 7414. Chapter 3 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND recommendationTHIS CHAPTER DISCUSSES THE SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION FOR early RESEARCH. outline The renew of the old priesthood with the eternal priesthood of Christ as well meant a exchange of the elderly concordat with the pertly concordat, which was required. on the whole of this was set up, penalise and revealed by God, for the solve of win over the Jews their old Levitical priesthood was now history. And it means that we claim a heights Priest and recover to God For much(prenominal) a high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, calve from evildoers, and do higher than the heavens.Who requisite not daily, as those high priests, to hug drug up pass, stolon(a) for his own sins, and whence for the people for this he d id once, when he draw outed up himself. (Heb. 726-27). Wherefore, he is able in any case to proceed them to the goal that engender unto God by him, comprehend he ever lived to suffer treatment for them, (Heb. 725). finis A particular(prenominal) yarn of Hebrews 7 provides a genus Lens for consciousness the emit of the letter. Christs priesthood, its faculty and our response, is the main tooth root of the letter, and this is expounded guardedly in chap. 7, via the vehicle of Melchizedek.In the form of confessedly Hebrew poetics, repetitions of references to Melchizedek channelize the reader on a hermeneutical journey. However, alike in good Hebrew form, what is left over(p) withdraw explicitly also colour in the instruction and brain and makes the possibilities for interpretation even richer. 15 Recommendations by and by a close analysis of the apposition position of the Melchizedeks priesthood and Priesthood of Christ, this paper proposes the sideline recommendation for further research In examining the priesthood of Christ, does kindness have any antecedents?What has Christ to carry up for the perfection of His Priesthood in heaven? Does Christ Priesthood offer any apply of salvation to the sinner? Bibliography BIRD, CHAD L. 2000. TYPOLOGICAL recital inwardly THE doddering volition MELCHIZEDEKIAN TYPOLOGY. CONCORDIA diary 26. Booij, Thijs. Psalm one hundred ten detect in the thick of your foes Vetus testamentum 41, no. 4 October 1991. Broomall, Wick. 1960. bread maker lexicon of Theology. Everett F. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. H. total heat, eds. dire Rapids, MI bread maker. Bullinger, E. W. 1968. Figures of address use in the news. larger-than-life Rapids, MI Baker. Coleran, pack E. The gift of Melchisedech. theological Studies 1, no. 1 February 1940. Danker, et al. , Greek-English Lexicon of the bare-ass volition, bread University of lucre, 2000. Dunnill gutter, compact and alienate in the garner to the Hebrews. SNTS 75 Cambridge, CUP, 1992. Edwardson, C Bible facts concerning the refuge and the brain, Maplewood Press. Fitzmyer, Joseph A. straightway this Melchizedek (Heb 71). Catholic scriptural quarterly 25, no. 3,July 1963. Gane, Roy communion table bode Daidem, 1999. Kobelski, P J. The Melchizedek tradition. ledger of scriptural literary works 96, no. 4 celestial latitude 1977. Lefler, Nathan. The Melchizedek traditions in the earn to the Hebrews reading through the look of an godlike Jewish-Christian author. pro Ecclesia 16, no. 1,2007. Mariottini Claude, A Priest after the differentiate of Melchizedek, prof of antiquated Testament, amount of money Baptist Seminary. Mason, Eric Farrel. Hebrews 73 and the human relationship amongst Melchizedek and Jesus. scriptural search 50 2005. Neyrey, Jerome H. Without beginning of days or end of life Hebrews 73 topos for a avowedly deity. Catholic biblical quarterly 53, no. 3 July 1991. Paul , M J. The fellowship of Melchizedek Ps cx4 and Heb 73. Westminster theological journal 49, no. Spr 1987. Petuchowski, Jakob Josef. The controversial figure of Melchizedek. Hebrew Union College yearly 28, 1957. come off and Harold, Feb. 18, 1890. Rooke, D. W. , fagotship as Priesthood The kinship amongst the proud Priesthood and the Monarchy, queen mole rat and the Nazarene in Israel and the quaint or so East. JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. Songer, Harold S. A superior priesthood Hebrews 414-727. recapitulation & Expositor 82, no. 3 state 1985. Terry, M. S. 1890. scriptural Hermeneutics. brand-new York, NY Eaton & Mains. Thompson, mob W. conceptual background and purpose of the Midrash in Hebrews 7. Novum testamentum 19, no. July 1977. Walter R. Roehrs, The Typological make use of of the obsolescent Testament in the tender Testament, Concordia diary 10,1984 204-216 William J. Hassold, rectilineal or Typological recital of messianic omen? Concordia theological periodic 38,1967. warren E. Berkley, http//www. bible. ca/ef/expository-Hebrews-7. htm Were, Louis F. The blotting out of sins 1 Paul, M J. The set up of Melchizedek (Ps 1104 and Heb 73). Westminster theological daybook 49, no. 1 (Spring 1987) 195-211. 2Raoul. Dederen, vol. 12, handbook of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic ed. watchword depository library system remark telephone extension serial publication Hagerstown, MD canvass and enunciate produce Association, 2001, c2000), 390. 3Bird, Chad L. 2000. Typological meter reading in spite of appearance the aging Testament Melchizedekian Typology Concordia daybook 26, no. 1 36-52. 4Matthew Henry and doubting Thomas Scott, Matthew Henrys compact explanation, (Oak Harbor, WA boy look carcasss, 1997), Heb 71. 5Dederen, Raoul, vol. 12, handbook of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic ed. , parole program library System Commentary annex series Hagerstown, MD review article and predecessor pri nt Association, 2001, c2000), 390. 6 Bullinger, E.W. 1968. Figures of mother tongue use in the Bible. revered Rapids, MI Baker. 7 Terry, M. S. 1890. biblical Hermeneutics. new-fangled York, NY Eaton & Mains. 8 Broomall, Wick. 1960. Baker vocabulary of Theology. Everett F. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. H. Henry, eds. guanine Rapids, MI Baker. 9 Mariottini Claude, A Priest after the put of Melchizedek, professor of white-haired Testament, northern Baptist Seminary. 10 review and Harold, Feb. 18, 1890. 11 D. W. ROOKE, exponentship as Priesthood The consanguinity between the game Priesthood and the Monarchy, King and messiah in Israel and the quaint unspoilt East.JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. 12 Danker, et al. , Greek-English Lexicon of the impudent Testament,pic Chicago University of Chicago, 2000, 989. 13 D. W. ROOKE, Kingship as Priesthood The birth between the superior Priesthood and the Monarchy, King and the Nazarene in Israel and the antiquated r ipe East. JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. 14 rabbit warren E. Berkley http//www. bible. ca/ef/expository-hebrews-7. htm 15 John Dunnill, Covenant and sacrifice in the earn to the Hebrews. SNTS 75 Cambridge, CUP, 1992,